Piracy in Paraguay: 
A Serious Threat to Growth and Prosperity in the America
by Margalit Edelman

AdTI Issue Brief No. 173
July 1999
 

Executive Summary

The effects of Paraguayan piracy are devastatingly far-reaching, hindering local development while also seriously threatening the United States and Paraguay’s Latin American neighbors. Piracy in this tiny Latin American country costs the U.S. nearly $300 million each year and rivals major pirate nations like China and Russia.

Paraguay’s sea of counterfeits and fakes drowns local innovators and scares off potential investors. The U.S. and other countries lose millions of dollars as pirated recordings, video games, and merchandise flood neighboring countries, often decimating their industries. Extensive corruption promotes (and is promoted by) piracy, creating an environment of lawlessness without borders. Weapons, drugs and even terrorists have found their way to Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina through Paraguay. Legislative efforts to improve intellectual property protection have been stymied by limited enforcement.

Because U.S. exports dominate the Latin American market, reducing Paraguay’s role as the central distribution point for pirated goods is crucial for expanding trade. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) should continue to monitor Paraguay under its Section 306 category, which permits the imposition of sanctions if Paraguay fails to fulfill its bilateral trade agreements. The U.S. and Latin American countries should also work closely with the Paraguayan government to encourage more extensive anti-piracy efforts and leverage Paraguay’s participation in regional trade alliances with the country’s ability to confront piracy and corruption. Ultimately, improving intellectual property protection will increase U.S. regional commerce, spur Paraguayan development and also speed up the hemispheric integration process.


 
American nation is consistently one of the worst offenders in pirated goods. In 1997, Paraguay had the 9th highest  domestic CD and cassette piracy level in the world and  the 12th highest worldwide software piracy rates. Paraguay’s 1998 piracy levels, an astonishing 90% for sound recordings and musical compositions, 99% for entertainment software (e.g. videogames) and 85% for motion pictures, rivals even the most notorious global pirates. Overall, pirated goods in Paraguay cost the United States almost $300 million annually.
                                
As a center for transshipment, Paraguay facilitates the distribution of pirated goods throughout the Americas. Large shipments of counterfeit goods, usually originating in China, Taiwan and Macau, are frequently discovered in Miami and Panama en route to Paraguay. In just the past year, US Customs seized 14,000 counterfeit Sony Play Station Compact Disks valued at more than $15 million,  1.3 million CDs and CD-Roms  and countless counterfeit Nintendo video game cartridges, business applications programs and electronic dictionaries before they reached Paraguay. 
                                
The American software industry estimates annual losses resulting from Paraguayan piracy at nearly $14 million. Reducing international software piracy is crucial to the American computer industry, since global software piracy costs the US more than $11.2 billion in revenues, $1 billion in tax revenues and as many as 130,000 jobs annually.
                                
Latin American countries would also benefit significantly from decreased piracy. A recent PriceWaterhouseCoopers study estimated that if Latin America reduced its overall business software piracy to the benchmark level of 27% (from the current overall level of 68%), it would potentially increase employment by 127,936 and increase tax revenues by $2.3 billion in two to three years.  
                                
Reducing software piracy is particularly important for Paraguay, which has no local software industry. It is not surprising that, under the current conditions, “the region’s code writers interested in making a living do not dedicate themselves to consumer applications like games or basic programs that are vulnerable to theft.”  Business Software Alliance president Robert Holleyman criticized the somewhat naive outlook of many Latin American countries and emphasized the disastrous long term effects of piracy, “These countries probably think they’re the winners because they’re using American software...But they’re really the losers, because they’ll never develop an indigenous software industry.”
                                
Paraguayan piracy has a similarly devastating effect on the recording industry. According to Jay Berman, chairman of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, “It’s a double whammy: The world’s major record companies are reluctant to invest in these countries and these countries are losing export dollars that could be generated from the sale of music by local artists...In short, piracy is the number one obstacle to developing a healthy music industry in Latin America and the Caribbean.” As the major Latin American center for transshipments, Paraguay’s unabated piracy is at the heart of the problem.

In 1998 alone, the American recording industry estimated losses of $280 million as a result of Paraguayan piracy.
                                
Many other American industries have also suffered as a result of Paraguay’s deficient intellectual property protection. The Motion Picture Association reports losses of up to $2 million annually, while book piracy costs U.S. publishers approximately $2.5 million each year. Trademark violations result in massive losses for numerous American merchandise companies.
                                
Paraguay’s pirate economy is not to be underestimated. The Paraguayan black  market moves approximately $12 to $14 billion annually. For comparison, Paraguay’s gross product is only $9 billion. While no exact figures are available, the local chief of police in Ciudad del Este ( a locus of pirate activity) estimated that 100,000 vendors worked with pirated goods there. Others have put the figure closer to 7000. Either way, a substantial amount of people are well entrenched in a highly problematic sector of the economy.
 

Corruption and Piracy

Paraguay’s piracy problems are closely linked to widespread corruption. Ciudad del Este, a pirate’s paradise which sits on Paraguay’s border with Argentina and Brazil, clearly illustrates why Paraguay was recently reported to be the second most corrupt country out of  85 surveyed. The city’s streets are crowded with vendors hawking fake watches, sneakers, clothing and music. The vendors are only the last link in a chain of operations that often includes the implicit approval of government officials, and occasionally their explicit participation. Even the state governor was under investigation after an airstrip and two unmarked planes were discovered on his property.
                                
In the vicious cycle of piracy and corruption, government officials rarely implement the existing copyright and patent laws, and are less likely to push through tougher legislation. Police and judges nominally enforce the regulations in place. Some don’t even go that far, “They’re bought and controlled by organized crime,”says Pedro Contrera, chief of the national police’s anti-counterfeiting squad. 
                                
When intellectual property cases do actually go to court, thorough enforcement is often hindered by non-transparent judicial practices. Paraguay’s dishonest judiciary reflects a larger regional problem that continues to hamper Latin America. The World Bank recently reported that Latin America’s judicial systems suffer from, “major inefficiencies, delays, and resultant high costs, a lack of transparency, widespread corruption; a lack of predictability in the outcome of cases; and in some instances, political interference in judicial decisions by the executive branch.” 
         
                      
Current Intellectual Property Policy

Under pressure from the U.S. and its Latin American neighbors, Paraguay improved its intellectual property laws in 1998.  A law ratified last August provides specific protection for well known trademarks. However, the new copyright law enacted in October has several serious flaws. Alarmingly, it regards copyright piracy as a private, rather than public, crime. Therefore, it is the victim’s responsibility to initiate legal action; the government offers no proactive assistance. 
                                
Paraguay’s patent law remains seriously deficient. Like many other Latin American countries, attempts to alter such laws have met with strong opposition, particularly from local pharmaceutical companies. However, on a positive note,  Paraguay’s congress was reviewing draft legislation to improve the patent regime. 
                                
Paraguay also signed a bilateral agreement with the U.S., committing to making the maximum effort to be TRIPs compliant withing three months of the opening session of congress in March 1999.
                                
While the USTR praised Paraguay’s new laws and officially ended its 301 investigation in November, it justifiably remained skeptical of Paraguay’s enforcement efforts. USTR and the Paraguayan government signed a Memorandum of Understanding and Enforcement Action Plan(MOU), in which Paraguay agreed to implement institutional reforms and increase enforcement efforts. This “special enforcement period” was scheduled to end in March, however, the USTR has
extended the deadline until September 1999. Nonetheless, the International Intellectual Property Alliance reported in February that little progress had been made.  The MOU is just one of many unfulfilled agreements in Paraguay’s lengthy history of inadequate intellectual property protection. Even though Paraguay appears to have taken serious action on paper, a legacy of widespread corruption has prevented enforcement of the laws in place and allowed many offenders to go free.
                                

What the U.S. Should do

The USTR now monitors Paraguay under its section 306 category, allowing the United States to immediately impose sanctions if Paraguay fails to comply with its bilateral Intellectual Property agreements. Though eager to offer President Macchi an opportunity to take action, the USTR should not hesitate to threaten or use sanctions, and if necessary, initiate World Trade Organization(WTO) dispute settlement proceedings (as it did with Argentina) if Paraguay once again fails to improve its abominable record of intellectual property protection. The USTR’s decision to conduct an out-of -cycle review in December will also help ensure that Paraguay is serious about meeting its TRIPs obligations. 
                                
The USTR and the government should continue to promote enforcement training programs which teach officials in Paraguay how to recognize intellectual property violations, how to conduct successful raids, and how to prosecute those responsible. The U.S. should encourage Paraguay to take advantage of the World Intellectual Property Organization and WTO’s joint initiative to provide technical cooperation for developing countries, which offers assistance in preparing legislation, training, institution building, and modernizing intellectual property systems and enforcement. Such efforts should be complemented with continued support of programs that aim to clean up the troubled Latin American judiciary and reduce corruption. 
                                
Industry leaders should also continue to pressure Paraguay, particularly through investigatory efforts and the judicial avenues available to them. Until Paraguay rectifies its egregious copyright law, it will be up to the victims of piracy to jumpstart the enforcement and punitive process. American industry groups should also promote an anti-piracy support network by working with their Latin American counterparts and engaging those performers, artists, software designers and local industry leaders who are negatively affected by the piracy.
                     
          
What Latin America should do

Although democratization and liberalized trade policies have helped revitalize regional economies, Paraguay’s pirates’ kingdom remains a threat to the economies and safety of its Latin American neighbors.
                                
The Paraguayan black market, both its products and the crime and corruption it encourages, frequently spill over the borders. Neighboring Latin American countries find their markets deluged with fakes and counterfeits, and occasionally the criminal element that accompanies them.
                                
Even Argentina, notorious for its militant pharmaceutical pirates, has criticized the Paraguayan situation. Argentina’s interior minister, Carlos Corach, has called for tighter border controls and warned of a growing threat posed by Islamic fundamentalists stationed in Ciudad del Este, calling the city “a unique sanctuary for crime and impunity.” Indeed, the Hezbollah guerrillas responsible for the deadly 1994 bombing of the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires were thought to have been based there. Marijuana, cocaine and illegal weapons are frequently smuggled into Brazil and  Argentina. 
                                
As Paraguay’s geographical neighbors and Mercosur (Southern Common Market) trading partners, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay have a great stake in reducing Paraguayan piracy. Efforts to tighten borders and frontier crossings should focus more on confiscating pirated goods, not just contraband. 
                                

What Paraguay should do

If Paraguay is to convince its Mercosur and Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) partners that it can provide a stable democratic economy capable of international trade, the Macchi administration must confront the rampant piracy and copyright infringement that currently occurs. The intellectual property violations that are the norm serve as a major impediment to the country’s development and stability. Studies have shown that pirate nations develop imbalanced economies incapable of participating in a competitive market. They also have weak leverage in trade talks and their position will worsen as non-tariff trade barriers like this become a larger component of trade liberalization.
                                
Paraguay must break from its history of unfulfilled agreements. While the paper trail former Presidents Raul Grau Cubas and his predecessor, Juan Carlos Wasmosy left behind seems to indicate a genuine effort to fight piracy, the laws and agreements they tendered were rarely enforced. With FTAA negotiations ongoing and the January 1, 2000 TRIPs implementation deadline rapidly approaching, Paraguay must move fast to ensure that it meets regional and global trade standards. If not, it faces exclusion from a burgeoning market that promises to improve and increase regional  development.
                                
Piracy in Paraguay is a threat to domestic and regional growth and prosperity. It rightfully provokes the ire of the international software, entertainment and merchandise industries who are reluctant to invest in Paraguay. It discourages innovation by rewarding imitation, and stanches home grown industry. It offers no hopes of long term economic prosperity or stability, and actively prevents development. While Brazil, Uruguay, Chile and Argentina have forged robust economies out of the ashes of 1980s financial crises, Paraguay has made little progress.
                                
If Latin America is to continue along the path of economic reforms and trade liberalization that it embarked upon, one of the last remaining trade barriers, the lack of intellectual property protection, must be removed. As a small country with a big piracy problem, Paraguay will be key to regional reform and success.
                                

Note: This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution and its directors nor is it to be understood as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation before Congress.                 
                                
                                
Notes
                                
1. “IIPA Country Report: Paraguay” 15 Feb. 1999, International Intellectual Property Alliance, see http://www.iipa.com/
                                
2. “U.S. Launches Global Software Piracy Initiative,” Business Alert - US, Hong Kong Trade Development Council, Issue 20, 19 Oct. 1998, see http://www.tdc.org.hk/alert/us9820.htm
                                
3. Schemo, Diana Jean, “In Paraguay Border Town, Almost Anything Goes,” New York Times, 15 Mar. 1998: p.3.
                                
4. IIPA, see note 1
                                
 5. See Business Software Alliance webpage, http://www.bsa.org
                                
6.  “Contributions of the Packaged Software Industry to the Global Economy” BSA/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers report, October 1998.
                                
7. Stinson, Douglass, “Hard Sell, ” Latin Trade, Dec. 1998: p. 88.
                                
8. Flynn, Laurie, “Trade Agreements had Little Impact On Overseas Software Piracy, ” New York Times (Cybertimes), 24 Jan. 1996. 
                                
9. Bustos, Sergio. “The roots of music piracy” Latin Trade, December 1998: p. 12.
                                
10. IIPA, see note 1
                                
11. IIPA, see note 1
                                
12. Warn, Ken, “City of fakes on Paraguay’s wild frontier,” The Financial Times, 4 Feb. 1998: p.3.
                                
13. Schemo, p. 3
                                
14. “Transparency International Ranks 85 Countries in Largest Ever Corruption Perceptions Index,” Berlin, 22 Sept.1998, see http://www.transparency.de
                                
15. Schemo, p.3.
                                
16.  Ibid., p. 3
                                
17. Otis, John, “The Clamor to Clean up Latin America’s Judiciary Is Growing,” Latin Trade, June 1997.
                                
 18. Warn, p. 3
                                
19. Ibid,  p. 3